Jo Walton ([info]papersky) wrote,
@ 2007-07-24 02:21:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Susan Palwick's Shelter.
This is an absolutely amazing new major SF novel.

It's forty years in the future. Altruism is a treatable mental problem. AIs exist and are banned in the US, because using them would be slavery. They're doing great things in Africa though. Brainwipe is being used on criminals; it has an 80% success rate of making them new people. Pity about the others. There's a new plague called CV or "caravan virus" which comes on like the flu. Technology has advanced notably in many fields, solving some problems and creating others. Global warming is a bit of a problem too. There's a new Gaian religion that has temples mostly in parks, because of the noise of the animals. Terrorism, weird domestic terrorism, can erupt horrifyingly while people are going about their lives. You can have GPS cells in your blood to prevent kidnapping, but good luck getting away from the media.

This is a novel about memory and identity and awareness and forgiveness and what it means to be a person. It has wonderful rounded three-dimensional characters, as you'd expect from Palwick, and it does the thing SF does so well of examining human issues through the lens of the future and technology. (I especially adored the parts from the point of view of a house.) It doesn't shy away from the issues either -- of course you'd try to protect someone from brainwipe, but it would be a much easier book if they didn't need it. This isn't an easy book and parts of it are harrowing -- but it's also absolutely brilliant. It's a significant book, the sort of thing everyone intersted in SF ought to be reading and talking about.

I liked Palwicks' earlier novels, and her stunning short stories, but I like this one even more -- this may be because I care about SF more than fantasy. I think she's at the top of her form in SF here, as she was in fantasy for last year's (Mythopoeic Award nominated) The Necessary Beggar.

(Don't be put off by the odd mainstreamy cover of a house or the fact that Shelter is for some reason a trade paperback original. Publishers make some very odd marketing decisions sometimes.)


(19 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]buymeaclue
2007-07-24 11:31 am UTC (link)
Oh, yay! I thought this was fascinating, but I wasn't sure how much general appeal it would have. I will cheer every time I see someone speak kindly of it. Cheer!

(Reply to this)


[info]kythiaranos
2007-07-24 12:03 pm UTC (link)
Ooo, thanks for posting about this one. I'll have to go look for it. The stuff of Palwick's that I've read has been awesome.

(Reply to this)


[info]sdn
2007-07-24 12:20 pm UTC (link)
i love that cover!

(Reply to this)


[info]jazzfish
2007-07-24 12:31 pm UTC (link)
Susan Palwick . . .

*pokes at google*

Oh. The author of that insanely creepy and scary and brilliant and /good/ story "Gestella" in _Starlight 3_.

*adds to list, near the top*

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]buymeaclue
2007-07-24 05:10 pm UTC (link)
She has a recent collection out as well: "The Fate of Mice."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]agrumer
2007-07-24 01:25 pm UTC (link)
Why would I be put off by a paperback release? I'm tempted to buy a copy just to encourage the publisher in that direction. I'm put off by hardcover.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2007-07-24 03:00 pm UTC (link)
Trade paperbacks, or what I call "yuppiebacks" that are the size of hardbacks, thus gaining me nothing hand/sizewise, generally less well bound than standard paperbacks, and costing as much as a hardcover, seem to me to combine the worst of all worlds.

What I like, indeed, actively prefer, are standard A-format paperbacks (like most US paperbacks), or indeed standard B-format paperbacks (like Tor's Orb line, or the new Tam Lin from Firebird) but not these unwieldy things.

I've sometimes thought that I'd happily pay more for a paperback when the hardback comes out -- instead of paying $35 for a hardback, I'd pay $40 for a paperback *right then*. One day, when micro print-runs become normal, I suppose I'll be able to do this from Amazon.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]agrumer
2007-07-24 03:18 pm UTC (link)
I find that oversized paperbacks are often still smaller and lighter than hardcovers. Take these figures for Cryptonomicon from Amazon.com:

Hardcover:
Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.1 x 1.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 2.9 pounds

Trade Paperback:
Product Dimensions: 8.1 x 5.3 x 1.6 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds

Mass-market Paperback:
Product Dimensions: 6.7 x 4.3 x 1.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]syberghost
2007-07-24 03:53 pm UTC (link)
Amazon, schmamazon. Picture this:

You go to the Fedex-Kinkos-Borders website and pick your book. It's printed out at the closest Kinkos. By 10am the next day (or possibly the same day if you're in a big city and your delivery address is a business) the guy in the purple and green shirt shows up at your door with it.

Don't like the web? Ok, you go to Fedex-Kinkos-Borders and you look through the stacks. Instead of having 15 copies of each really popular book, they only have one, so they have 15 times as many books. You pick the one you want, scan the UPC code and pay, then go have coffee. When it finishes printing, they bring it to your table.

Or if you're REALLY in a hurry, you buy the one on the shelf, they print a new one and reshelve it five minutes after you leave.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nolly
2007-07-24 05:25 pm UTC (link)
I haven't found trade paperbacks to be less well bound overall; if anything, they seem to hold up better than the mass-market PBs. They're usually at a much more comfortable price-point for me than HBs; I only buy new HBs under special circumstances: author is signing locally (most recently, Territory and Gospel of the Knife) or must read immediately (HP7). Knowing this is trade makes me much more likely to pick it up soon.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]papersky
2007-07-24 06:02 pm UTC (link)
The problem with this is that "trade paperback" is a term of bookselling, and "C-format" or "yuppieback" is a book size. "Trade paperbacks" include B format (e.g. Orb) and everything ever published in Britain. C-format paperbacks are what I think has the problem -- I have never had an A or B format paperback lose a cover, but I have had trouble with C format.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nolly
2007-07-24 07:07 pm UTC (link)
I gueass I'm not sure what these different types are. Perhaps when I have time to get to a bookstore and look for Palwick's book, all will be clearer. I think what I think of as trade paperback is what you're calling "B-format", and "A-format" is what I call "mass-market paperback", but I'm not sure about "C-format". I have had several mass-market PBs fall apart, though -- sometimes the covers comes off altogether, sometimes pages come unglued.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]calico_reaction
2007-07-24 01:30 pm UTC (link)
Thanks so much for sharing. It looks like something I'd like to check out one day. :)

I'm a fan of trade paperback over hardcover anyway. ;) It's cheaper, and I like the aesthetics of trades much better. Hardcovers tend to remind me of reading textbooks when I was in elementary school.

But then again, I'm weird. ;) The cover art is a bit odd though. You'd never guess it as SF.

(Reply to this)


[info]kalmn
2007-07-24 02:29 pm UTC (link)
susan palwick goes to wiscon...

[tempt tempt tempt]

(Reply to this)


[info]syberghost
2007-07-24 03:45 pm UTC (link)
One I'm reading right now about similar themes is Charles Stross' Accelerando

Of course I'm reading it in my preferred format, bits on flash RAM, but it's also available in various dead-tree editions for you stodgy old Luddites. :)

http://www.accelerando.org/book/

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]buymeaclue
2007-07-24 05:13 pm UTC (link)
The themes may be similar. Based on my experience with Stross, the approach/execution is wildly different.

(Which isn't to say that a reader who likes one will automatically not like the other, of course. Just...don't pick up the Palwick expecting it to bear much similarity to the Stross.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]papersky
2007-07-24 06:04 pm UTC (link)
But reading them together can still be stimulating.

I think there's too much in the way of artificial divisions within SF these days. It used to be that people read everything. I think a Stross fan could enjoy Shelter.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]buymeaclue
2007-07-24 06:24 pm UTC (link)
You're preaching to the choir on this count. _I_ read everything. *g*

I did mean it when I said: Which isn't to say that a reader who likes one will automatically not like the other, of course.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mizchalmers
2009-07-02 07:59 pm UTC (link)
THANK YOU for this rec. One of the most amazing things I have read in years. It made my jaw drop. TWICE.

(Reply to this)


(19 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…