Jo Walton ([info]papersky) wrote,
@ 2004-09-19 11:50:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Books this last little while
Mostly a very good crop this last couple of weeks.



Anthony Trollope Mr Scarborough's Family. This is a late Trollope and not his best. It's hard to read because it's working on a very odd assumption about legitimacy -- that an illegitimate person is "nobody" -- which is very hard to be in any sympathy with at all. It's also contrived, in a way Trollope generally isn't. But even so there are some lovely moments in it.

Angelica Gorodischer, Ursula Le Guin (trans) Kalpa Imperial. This was given to me at Worldcon by Kelly Link. It's deeply weird, and also brilliant, but it isn't a novel. I can see why Le Guin wanted to translate it, because it's the same kind of object as Always Coming Home only much better. KI is a series of stories about an imaginary empire, some of them absolutely brilliant, and all of them told in a wonderful and peculiar way. Nothing happens -- well, lots of things happen, but there's no overall arc of story. The summary of this book would be "there's this empire, see." It could have had a plot, and until about two-thirds of the way through I was expecting it to have one, but it didn't. The story I loved the most was the one about the city that was at times the capital and at other times almost forgotten. KI is wonderful and bizarre and not like anything else, and if you're ever in the mood for something like that, it's a very good example of it.

Ruth Rendell Going Wrong. Technically a re-read, but all I remembered about it was that it was scary. I was right about that, it was. This is the story of an obsessive love and two awful people. It's absolutely brilliantly told. I wouldn't classify it as either a murder story or a detective story, this is one of the ones where she absolutely transcends what she's supposed to be doing. It's scary, compelling, and a wonderful use of first-person unpleasant.

Theodora Goss This Rose Has Twelve Petals and other stories, chapbook, given to me at Worldcon by Kelly Link. I'd never have bought it -- I'd never have bought any of these things, probably, but this was terrific. It's a collection of stories and poems Goss has a wonderful control of language that reminds me a little of Sarah Monette. The title story is a retelling of Sleeping Beauty and it's just perfect, every word right, and every image too. I just wanted to walk around the structure of it saying "Wow".

L.M. Montgomery The Alpine Path. This is a very saccharine autobiographical article originally published in magazines but later as a book. I couldn't in conscience recommend it, but I wanted to read it. I'd like to read an honest biography of Montgomery, I wonder if there is one?

Ken MacLeod Newton's Wake. Well I thought it was brilliant. You know how in every Ken MacLeod novel there are millions of post-humans massacred to achieve a happy ending? In this one, that happens before the beginning, and the story is set during the aftermath. I liked it a great deal, and there's a scene early on in this novel which made me laugh so much I had to stop reading. It isn't as deep as the Fall Revolution books, (but then again what is?) and I loathed the Scots dialogue, but if you want interesting SFnal SF wiht thoughts about the second-order implications of everything, you can't beat this.

Barbara Vine The Blood Doctor. First re-read. Another un-putdownable Rendell. I wish I could figure out how she does it.

Laurie J. Marks Fire Logic. This is something else Kelly Link gave me at Worldcon. I didn't think I wanted to read it, but she was right. This is a very good example of what I mean when I say that all fantasy looks the same, and none of it looks like something I want to read. The cover of this one shows a woman with a sword, and, well, sigh.

The story is medium scale, about a country. There's magic, very interestingly done elemental magic. The different cultures are well done, the history feels like history, and I very much like the solution to the problem. It also finishes at the end, miraculously for fantasy. There are odd things about the balance of the story and the characters, which I think are likely first novel things, but on the whole I thought it was very impressive and I'm glad I read it.


(21 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sartorias
2004-09-19 09:44 am UTC (link)
I haven't seen a good bio of Montgomery, but her journals are fascinating and the second and third can be extremely harrowing. I don't know if the fifth has come out yet--they are easier to find in Canada--but I hope to come across it, if it has, even though it will probably be the end of her life.

(Reply to this)


[info]janetmiles
2004-09-19 09:47 am UTC (link)
first-person unpleasant

I would like to sit here quietly and admire this phrase for a bit.

(Reply to this)


[info]kayselkiemoon
2004-09-19 10:11 am UTC (link)
Theodora Goss This Rose Has Twelve Petals and other stories, chapbook, given to me at Worldcon by Kelly Link. I'd never have bought it -- I'd never have bought any of these things, probably, but this was terrific. It's a collection of stories and poems Goss has a wonderful control of language that reminds me a little of Sarah Monette. The title story is a retelling of Sleeping Beauty and it's just perfect, every word right, and every image too. I just wanted to walk around the structure of it saying "Wow".

eep! she was on a panel I attended at worldcon, and I remember being impressed (and pleased that she's a bostonian). but I make a habit of acquiring fairytale retellings, so now I'm even more pleased.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-09-19 10:25 am UTC (link)
I was likewise impressed by her on a panel, but I wouldn't have bought a chapbook, normally, unless I already really liked the author.

You'll like it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]khavrinen
2004-09-19 10:34 am UTC (link)
It also finishes at the end, miraculously for fantasy. There are odd things about the balance of the story and the characters, which I think are likely first novel things, but on the whole I thought it was very impressive and I'm glad I read it.

Not so much "first novel," as "first novel after a hiatus." Her last novel before Fire Logic was 1993's Dancing Jack, but that was her fifth. Her style has always felt a little oddly balanced to me, too, so I think that may be just the way she writes, but I sometimes like that. I have Fire Logic in my "to be read" pile, but haven't gotten to it yet, so I can't say if it "feels" similar to her previous books. It is all the more miraculous for "finishing at the end" given that the second volume, Earth Logic, is already out in hardback.

It's too bad that both Amazon and Barnes & Noble list "image not available" for The Watcher's Mask, as the Jim Warren cover art is both one of the most exquisite examples I've seen, and one of those rare cases where the elements of the art actually fit the elements of the story. The main character is a woman with multiple personalities, and the cover depicts part of her face in one color/expression, then an area where it appears the painting is crumbling away to reveal another face beneath it. The "what if" that I find interesting in it is the idea of a culture in which people with multiple personalities are common, even respected.

One other snippet -- this is the Laurie Marks mentioned in the dedication of The Lost Steersman, as a member of "The Fabulous Genrettes," the writer's group to which Rosemary Kirstein belongs.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-09-19 03:43 pm UTC (link)
Oh, a sequel.

What on earth could it possibly be about?

I liked that end as an end.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rachelmanija
2004-09-19 04:53 pm UTC (link)
But the political situation that all the characters had spent the entire book battling for or against was completely unresolved.

Coffee and ink has an overview of the earlier works of Laurie Marks here:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/coffee_and_ink/366227.html

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Spoilers!
[info]papersky
2004-09-20 05:30 am UTC (link)
Unresolved? You mean she doesn't go into the boring details of how they're going to achieve a synthesis of the people now they have a new healed G'deon? I took the way the Paladins and the Sainnites had stopped wanting to fight and the formation of the new tribe/order/family/whatever as quite sufficient. I even admired her for not putting in another chapter spelling it all out, never mind another sequel in which it no doubt becomes unexpectedly more difficult.

Thanks for the link, I'll check it later.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Watcher's Mask
[info]kchew
2004-09-19 07:56 pm UTC (link)
I read The Watcher's Mask years ago, and enjoyed it very much. She handled the mpd issue as a reasonable, believable part of the story rather than using it as a crutch to build sympathy for her main character. I missed Dancing Jack, but remember enjoying her first trilogy.

Full bibliographical Information is at her website.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]montoya
2004-09-19 12:05 pm UTC (link)
"The cover of this one shows a woman with a sword, and, well, sigh."

Plus, it's got that whole five-elements thing going on. Has there ever been a series of books written using that as an organizing theme that didn't come off badly?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]veejane
2004-09-20 07:13 am UTC (link)
Glad I'm not the only one who took a look at the cover (last year) and sighed and put it back. This despite recommendations that the book is better than what it looks like.

I have come to the sorrowful understanding that book jacket design will almost never satisfy me, and I will actively hate it for almost anything by large publishers in genre (in its first edition, later reprints sometimes taking taste and the 'broader' audience into account).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-09-20 07:30 am UTC (link)
The cover, according to the publishers, is supposed to be a billboard.

I think it's supposed to be a way for the book to find its friends -- and there is a difference.

Someone from the Tor art department asked at one point if there were any dragon-fights in Tooth and Claw, with the thought of putting one on the cover. Now there are, but it seemed to me, and I said this at the time, that anyone wanting a dragon-fighting book would hate the story, and anyone wanting the book it is, would be repelled by a dragon-fighting cover. They agreed, and I really love the cover it has, with the Mona Lisa dragon.

I'm not sure what cover they could have put on Fire Logic to make me buy it. My immediate thought is "something tasteful and less generic", but I can't think of one image that would have worked and been a commercial cover and done that.

I do think it should have been possible to do something that didn't make me shy away from the book when being handed it as a gift! Because I did in fact like it when I read it.

Oh well, it isn't as bad as the British cover of the first three Vlad books, which someone I used to know described as "proactively hideous" and which prevented me from reading them, despite recommendations, for several years.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]i_ate_my_crusts
2004-09-19 12:27 pm UTC (link)
The story is medium scale, about a country.

[pleased noise] I use small/medium/large scale terminology. If my bookshelves are anything to go by I prefer "small scale" fantasy - which I define as "saving your relationship/family, rather than saving the world...although you might manage that in the process", but I read a bunch of medium and large scale stuff.

Might have to give the Laurie Marks book a look.

(Reply to this)


[info]orzelc
2004-09-19 05:34 pm UTC (link)
Ken MacLeod Newton's Wake. Well I thought it was brilliant. You know how in every Ken MacLeod novel there are millions of post-humans massacred to achieve a happy ending? In this one, that happens before the beginning, and the story is set during the aftermath. I liked it a great deal, and there's a scene early on in this novel which made me laugh so much I had to stop reading.

Which scene, out of curiousity?

I liked this one quite a bit, too. Which was nice, since I found the only other book of his that I've read (The Cassini Division) extremely irritating. With this one, I could see why smart people like him.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-09-20 05:33 am UTC (link)
The one describing the stuff left lying around the apartment from old productions -- the tank from Macbeth and the balcony/anti-aircraft gun from Romeo and Juliet.

If you liked this and didn't like CD, think you'd probably like Cosmonaut Keep and sequels, now conveniently available in paperback.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]veejane
2004-09-20 07:16 am UTC (link)
The summary of this book would be "there's this empire, see."

I'd picked up Kalpa Imperial not long before Worldcon, and came to the same general conclusion you have: it's a series of semi-linked stories without an arc, in that abstract and lovely and artful way of Julio Cortazar. If you like that sort of thing, I very much recommend "The Island at Midday" and Blow-up and Other Stories, but I suspect it is an acquired taste.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-09-20 07:33 am UTC (link)
I'm not sure how often I'd like that kind of thing, if you see what I mean. I enjoyed KI, but I'm not in any hurry for any more yet.

Maybe by next summer.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

a completely different book...
[info]diony
2004-09-20 10:03 am UTC (link)
This is not in reference to your post, except inasmuch as its about books, but have you read The Brontes Went to Woolworths by Rachel Ferguson? It's from 1931, but was reprinted by Virago in the late 80s, and I'm reading it for the first time. It seems like the sort of book you must have read and would have strong opinions about (probably in favour) but of course I don't actually know.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: a completely different book...
[info]papersky
2004-09-20 10:24 am UTC (link)
I haven't read it, and I hadn't even heard of it, but I absolutely adore the title.

I shall look out for it henceforward.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: a completely different book...
[info]diony
2004-09-20 10:55 am UTC (link)
The title is what got me, but it's living up to the title wonderfully. The back cover summary is horrible as they often are, but Byatt wrote an introduction talking about how much she loved the book as a child. I'll keep my eye out for copies as well, since then I could enjoy sending one to you.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ailsaek
2004-09-21 03:29 pm UTC (link)
You said when I saw you at WorldCon that I should give you a nudge if there was anything in my LJ I wanted you to see. Well, I'm nudging. *grin* No, I'm not pregnant - even bigger than that. (Sorry to piggyback on your post, but I'm not sure the email address I have for you is current.)

*as Ailsa tiggers off into the sunset*

(Reply to this)


(21 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…