Jo Walton ([info]papersky) wrote,
@ 2004-08-17 09:29:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Share this!  Next Entry
Books This Long Time
I'm pretty much bound to have forgotten some.



W.E.B. Griffin, The Corps: VI-IX. See previous books entry. There's a huge jump from 1943 to 1950 between VIII and IX, which surprised me.

Sherwood Smith Crown Duel. Where was this book when I was a kid? I'd have loved it. I love it now, but now I could tell what was going to happen. It has everything -- a princess off having adventures and becoming a hero, a hero who at first appears to be a villain, though he didn't fool me for thirty seconds, characters, plot, world, and good writing. The first half is all dashing about having adventures and the second half is all politics and flirting with fans. I think it's all terrific and would recommend it to anyone who likes The Hero and the Crown. Well done [info]satorias for writing it and [info]sdn for bringing it back into print so I could buy it.

I was having a discussion with [info]zorinth the other day about what makes books really absorbing and "grabby" such that one can't bear to put them down, as opposed to books that are interesting, but you could finish them next week. I'm no nearer to being able to define what it actually is, but Crown Duel certainly has it.

Ruth Rendell The Veiled One, The Tree of Hands. Two good but very different Rendells. She loads the deck in ToH, to get the reader to sympathise with the character doing bad things, but it works. As with all the Rendell, these were first re-reads, read when they originally came out and not since.

Anthony Trollope The Belton Estate. Absolutely vintage Trollope, on top of his form, given to me by [info]lisajulie. There's a young woman prepared to starve to death rather than be beholden, and in a terrible state of unclarity as to which of two young men have caused her scales to turn pink. It's very funny and sll very delicately done.

Roger Zelazny Isle of the Dead, nth re-read. Zorinth took it to Britain to read, and I re-read it on the boat back from Ireland when I was full of cold and wanting something familiar. This is so familiar I practically have it memorized -- Zelazny at his best, wisecracking first person, fascinating SFnal universe, terrible puns.

William Manchester American Caesar, biography of Douglas MacArthur, my new hero. (At the bar in Eternicon, right now, MacArthur is explaining the use of airpower to Alexander the Great.) After reading Griffin, I was bursting to find out more about MacArthur. There was so much in this book, and so much of it so interesting and illuminating that I now want to read another biography. I'm not about to write an alternate history where he conquered the whole of Asia in the early fifties, but it's there for someone who wants it. Brilliant man. Brilliant book.

Gillian Bradshaw Render Unto Caesar. I think this may be her best book since The Beacon at Alexandria. It's about an Alexandrian banker who comes to Rome to recover a debt in the early years of the Principate, and it's all perfect.

William Tenn All Possible Worlds, nth re-read preparatory to panel at N4. This is a short story collection and it contains some of his Tenn's very best cleverest and funniest stories.

Cecil Woodham-Smith The Reason Why. Terrific book about the charge of the Light Brigade, with details and explainations and life-stories, well-written and fast paced. I read it on the train up to Lancaster and then gave it to [info]carandol. Amazing detail you couldn't make up -- Lord Raglan, who grew up in the Napoleonic Wars, during the Crimean War when the British were allied wiht the French and had the French with them fighting the Russians, kept causing confusion by accidentally calling the enemy "the French", out of long habit.


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]oracne
2004-08-17 07:00 am UTC (link)
ISLE OF THE DEAD is one of my favorite Zelazny books--which is saying something, since he was my favorite author for many years.

THE CHANGING LAND and DOORWAYS IN THE SAND are my other two faves.

(Reply to this)


[info]sartorias
2004-08-17 07:03 am UTC (link)
Big grin--it means a lot to have entertained you!

Have not read that Trollope...noting title down. (Isn't the Manchester excellent? That's one of my resource books.)

(Reply to this)


[info]adrian_turtle
2004-08-17 07:04 am UTC (link)
I liked _Render Unto Caesar_, very much indeed, but I didn't think it was one of her best. I can believe, on an intellectual level, that Hermogenes' attitudes are within the range of liberal Alexandrian thoughts of the time...but they still made him feel anachronistic enough to trip the story. That's the challenge of historical fiction (as opposed to a wholly created world, or even alternate history). Readers already know a lot of the background, and jarring that feels dissonant. I had as much personal sympathy for Hermogenes as for Charis, or Ariantes (whose liberal views felt deeper and somehow more plausible). I liked him better than John, though the general shape of their stories was somewhat similar.

(Reply to this)


[info]fidelioscabinet
2004-08-17 07:36 am UTC (link)
The Reason Why is excellent, but it's one of those books that puts my blood pressure into the danger range.

MacArthur was an amazing man--but I thank God he never managed to get himself elected president. It's hard to get people to see just why MacArthur was so dangerous, because nowadays, no one really knows much about him. They vaguely remember World War II, "I shall return", and that Truman fired him for some reason or other in Korea. His impact on Japan in the second half of the 20th century, the fact that he nearly turned the Korean War into World War II by invading China--and the fact that, given his nature, it was pretty much inevitable that he would invade China--is all mostly lost to history. All the force of his personality is as vanished as old perfume.

Here's a link to a recipe for Florentine cookies, as made by a bakery here in Nashville. The recipe contains no flour--but it does have rolled, or old-fashioned oats, almonds, butter, honey, cream, sugar, and chocolate. It's also egg-free. They are excellent, and the Food TV site has a great collection of recipes of one kind or another.

I've been watching the Olympics, and am trying to imagine the ancient Greek reaction to women's beach volleyball.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]yhlee
2004-08-17 10:49 am UTC (link)
Huh. This is an interesting perspective--I think that growing up in Korea, and learning at least that much Korean history, I had this sense of Macarthur as that brilliant but horrendously dangerous loose cannon. What was it, his plan for nuking the hell out of the Manchurian border and turning it into radioactive slag as a permanent "barrier"? That just boggled me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]juliansinger
2004-08-17 11:29 am UTC (link)
As an American, I had that sense of him as well. I would not have wanted him as an independent; he champed at the bit enough under Truman that it's kind of scary to contemplate what he could have done on his own.

He /was/ a godsend as a commander in WWII, but, y'know, not anything resembling a practical politician/diplomat.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fidelioscabinet
2004-08-17 11:55 am UTC (link)
These days Americans only learn history if it's on The History Channel, and involves big cool guns, from what I can see. It's one of the reasons I feel like a stranger in my own home at times.

From what I can tell, MacArthur chose to see everything on the Grand Scale--and was willfully completely blind to the effect of his plans and ideas on individuals. He was aware of it, he just decided it didn't matter as a factor in his planning.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nancylebov
2004-08-17 07:58 am UTC (link)
I especially like _Isle of the Dead_ for its vision of art as an answer to the void.

(Reply to this)


[info]rushthatspeaks
2004-08-17 10:47 am UTC (link)
Okay, I finished Tooth and Claw yesterday, and your entry just caused me to laugh until I hurt myself. Am now considering rereading a lot of Regency romances and laughing harder.

Thank you.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]papersky
2004-08-17 12:32 pm UTC (link)
Yes, well...

People keep asking me whether I'm going to write sequels to Tooth and Claw, and I keep saying that I don't need to, once you've read it, you can read Trollope that way for yourself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rushthatspeaks
2004-08-17 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Hm. It hadn't occurred to me as needing a sequel. I mean, it would be nice, but it wasn't crying for one.

I believe that about the Trollope, and I may well do so. Haven't hit Trollope before, oddly enough.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(11 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Log in with OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…